Cost-effectiveness of early detection of breast cancer in Catalonia (Spain)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer (BC) causes more deaths than any other cancer among women in Catalonia. Early detection has contributed to the observed decline in BC mortality. However, there is debate on the optimal screening strategy. We performed an economic evaluation of 20 screening strategies taking into account the cost over time of screening and subsequent medical costs, including diagnostic confirmation, initial treatment, follow-up and advanced care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used a probabilistic model to estimate the effect and costs over time of each scenario. The effect was measured as years of life (YL), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and lives extended (LE). Costs of screening and treatment were obtained from the Early Detection Program and hospital databases of the IMAS-Hospital del Mar in Barcelona. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare the relative costs and outcomes of different scenarios.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Strategies that start at ages 40 or 45 and end at 69 predominate when the effect is measured as YL or QALYs. Biennial strategies 50-69, 45-69 or annual 45-69, 40-69 and 40-74 were selected as cost-effective for both effect measures (YL or QALYs). The ICER increases considerably when moving from biennial to annual scenarios. Moving from no screening to biennial 50-69 years represented an ICER of 4,469€ per QALY.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A reduced number of screening strategies have been selected for consideration by researchers, decision makers and policy planners. Mathematical models are useful to assess the impact and costs of BC screening in a specific geographical area.</p

Vaccination against hepatitis B virus in Spain: a cost-effectiveness analysis

A cost-effectiveness analysis was made to determine the effectiveness of the following strategies of mass immunization with the new recombinant vaccine against the hepatitis B virus in Spain: vaccination of-adolescents, newborns, both populations, and vaccination plus passive immunization of newborns of HBsAg positive mothers. Decision trees supported on Markov models with Monte Carlo simulation have been used for the calculation of costs of the disease, and a mathematical model of differential equations was used for the simulation of the potential effectiveness of vaccination. The costs considered were those associated with the vaccination and travel of subjects, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease. The results are presented as additional cost or saving per case of infection prevented In all assumptions, results showed that the most effective strategy for mass vaccination was the combination of vaccinating all adolescents together with active and passive immunization of children born to HBsAg positive mothers

Economic evaluation of a mammography-based breast cancer screening programme in Spain.

The aim of the study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of a breast cancer (BC) mammography screening programme, compared to a do-nothing alternative, in Spain. Screening consisted of a biennial mammography performed on all women 50-65 years old. A marginal analysis including women 45-49 years old was also performed. With the aid of a decision tree model, the numbers of BC cases diagnosed through screening, BC cases missed by screening and false-positive BC cases were calculated. Costs were calculated by feeding local data into Markovian models and the cost-effectiveness ratio calculation was performed in a computer spread sheet. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted. Results were presented in ECUs of 1993. The cost- effectiveness ratio per avoided death is 115,500 ECUs and per saved life year 7,300 ECUs. Including women 45-49 years old in the programme raises this ratio to 229,000 and 9,400 ECUs respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed the efficacy of mammography, compliance of the programme and screening costs to be the more sensitive variables

Can local corticosteroid injection in the retrocalcaneal bursa lead to rupture of the Achilles tendon and the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle?

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to explain the cause-effect relationship in three patients who reported combined ruptures of the Achilles tendon and the gastrosoleus complex 6 months after they had received corticosteroids injections for the management of retrocalcaneal bursitis. METHODS: Three cryopreserved cadavers (three men, three left legs) were examined to assess the anatomic connection between the retrocalcaneal bursa and the Achilles tendon (distal and anterior fibers). Blue triptan medium contrast was injected. RESULTS: An unexpected connection between the retrocalcaneal bursa and the anterior fibers of the Achilles tendon was found in all instances. CONCLUSIONS: Local corticosteroid injection of the retrocalcaneal bursa may help the symptoms of retrocalcanear bursitis, but pose a risk of Achilles tendon rupture. This risk-benefit has to be taken into account when corticosteroid injections are prescribed to professional and high-level athletes

The use of cost per life year gained as a measurement of cost-effectiveness in Spain: a systematic review of recent publications

The objective of this study was to evaluate the methodological characteristics of cost-effectiveness evaluations carried out in Spain, since 1990, which include LYG as an outcome to measure the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. METHODS: A systematic review of published studies was conducted describing their characteristics and methodological quality. We analyse the cost per LYG results in relation with a commonly accepted Spanish cost-effectiveness threshold and the possible relation with the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained when they both were calculated for the same economic evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 62 economic evaluations fulfilled the selection criteria, 24 of them including the cost per QALY gained result as well. The methodological quality of the studies was good (55%) or very good (26%). A total of 124 cost per LYG results were obtained with a mean ratio of 49,529 and a median of 11,490 (standard deviation of 183,080). Since 2003, a commonly accepted Spanish threshold has been referenced by 66% of studies. A significant correlation was found between the cost per LYG and cost per QALY gained results (0.89 Spearman-Rho, 0.91 Pearson). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing interest for economic health care evaluations in Spain, and the quality of the studies is also improving. Although a commonly accepted threshold exists, further information is needed for decision-making as well as to identify the relationship between the costs per LYG and per QALY gained

Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of candesartan-hydrochlorothiazide 32/12.5 mg and 32/25 mg in patients not optimally controlled with candesartan monotherapy

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil 32 mg in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 12.5 mg or 25 mg in hypertensive patients not optimally controlled with candesartan monotherapy. Patients and methods. A total of 3521 patients with treated or untreated hypertension and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90-114 mmHg, entered a single-blind run-in phase with candesartan (16 mg for 2 weeks, followed by 32 mg for 6 weeks). At the end of the run-in phase, 1975 patients who still had DBP 90-114 mmHg were randomized to 8 weeks' double-blind treatment with either candesartan 32 mg (n=654), or candesartan-HCT 32/12.5 mg (n=656), or candesartan-HCT 32/25 mg (n=665). Principal results. At randomization, the mean blood pressure was similar in the three treatment groups (approximately 153/97 mmHg). It was reduced during the double-blind treatment phase by 6.1/5.6 mmHg in the candesartan 32 mg group, by 13.0/8.8 mmHg in the candesartan-HCT 32/12.5 mg group, and by 15.5/10.0 mmHg in the candesartan-HCT 32/25 mg group (p < 0.01 for all between treatment comparisons). All study treatments were generally well tolerated. Conclusion. Candesartan-HCT 32/12.5 mg and candesartan-HCT 32/25 mg are highly effective and provide improved blood pressure reduction and blood pressure control relative to candesartan 32 mg monotherapy, with maintained tolerability, in hypertensive patients whose blood pressure is not optimally controlled with candesartan monotherapy. Furthermore, candesartan-HCT 32/25 mg is more effective than candesartan-HCT 32/12.5 mg in this population